Font Size: 

The change in status of UNESA from a Public Service Agency (BLU) to the status of a State University with a Legal Entity (PTN-BH) has consequences in various aspects, especially from a legal perspective. The purpose of this article is to analyze how the arrangement of internal regulations in the UNESA after PTN-BH status. The research was carried out using normative research methods by taking inventory and identifying various internal regulations that were owned by UNESA, then analysis and evaluation is carried out using the Guideline for Evaluation of Legislation (6 Dimensions Guideline) which is a standardized instrument based on scientific methods and principles, especially law, so that the resulting evaluation recommendations have a quality that can be accounted for. The 6 Dimensional Guidelines can be used as a tool to detect whether a UNESA'S internal regulation overlapping, disharmony, contradictory, multiple interpretations, ineffective, incurring high costs. The findings show that the internal regulations currently in force within UNESA still have a number of problems including overlapping (3 findings), disharmony (3 findings), contradictory (1 finding), multiple interpretations (2 findings), and ineffective (2 findings). So it is necessary to immediately carry out harmonization and explain the formulation of several pertor.